On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 20:18:57 +0200 "Vlastimil Babka (SUSE)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah and I don't recall ever that a change to a mm tracepoint would ever > break someone who'd complain and we'd have to revert it. These are niche > enough. So I think the risk is low. Note, we have literally thousands of trace events already, so the chances of one being required by an application is rather low. Especially since access still requires root access, which limits it to administration tooling. That said, if you know of a tool that uses trace events, then those that it is likely to use can become an ABI. For mm trace evnets, rasdaemon is the tool to worry about. -- Steve
