Using my testsuite, I see the attached moan from lockdep.  Unfortunately, it
doesn't cause the testsuite to actually fail, so I'm going to have to manually
try and isolate the failing test.

David

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.18.0-rc2-fsdevel+ #910 Tainted: G        W     
---------------------------------------------
run/2642 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81203d81>] 
ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113abff>] 
lock_rename+0xb7/0xd7

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1);
  lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

7 locks held by run/2642:
 #0:  (sb_writers#15){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8114a1e2>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x46
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#17/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113c737>] 
do_rmdir+0xa9/0x165
 #2:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#17){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113c0ad>] 
vfs_rmdir+0x5a/0x115
 #3:  (sb_writers#8){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8114a1e2>] mnt_want_write+0x1f/0x46
 #4:  (&type->s_vfs_rename_key){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113ab88>] 
lock_rename+0x40/0xd7
 #5:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113abff>] 
lock_rename+0xb7/0xd7
 #6:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10/2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113ac15>] 
lock_rename+0xcd/0xd7

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 2642 Comm: run Tainted: G        W      3.18.0-rc2-fsdevel+ #910
Hardware name:                  /DG965RY, BIOS MQ96510J.86A.0816.2006.0716.2308 
07/16/2006
 ffffffff823989e0 ffff880038d8fa68 ffffffff815222f2 0000000000000006
 ffffffff823989e0 ffff880038d8fb38 ffffffff810738f4 000000000000000b
 ffff880037ebc710 ffff880038d8fb00 ffff880037ebcf58 0000000000000005
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff815222f2>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
 [<ffffffff810738f4>] __lock_acquire+0x7b5/0x1a17
 [<ffffffff8107522d>] lock_acquire+0xa3/0x11d
 [<ffffffff81203d81>] ? ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
 [<ffffffff8111ff14>] ? kfree+0x17e/0x1ca
 [<ffffffff8152580a>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5a/0x304
 [<ffffffff81203d81>] ? ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
 [<ffffffff81139123>] ? vfs_rename+0x602/0x689
 [<ffffffff81203d81>] ovl_cleanup_whiteouts+0x29/0xb4
 [<ffffffff81202252>] ovl_clear_empty+0x195/0x216
 [<ffffffff81202315>] ovl_check_empty_and_clear+0x42/0x5d
 [<ffffffff81056944>] ? creds_are_invalid+0x17/0x4a
 [<ffffffff81202a19>] ovl_do_remove+0x189/0x36a
 [<ffffffff81202c0b>] ovl_rmdir+0x11/0x13
 [<ffffffff8113c0f2>] vfs_rmdir+0x9f/0x115
 [<ffffffff8113c784>] do_rmdir+0xf6/0x165
 [<ffffffff8100d224>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x4a/0x4c
 [<ffffffff8100e43f>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase2+0x178/0x1c1
 [<ffffffff810e5aae>] ? context_tracking_user_exit+0x54/0xce
 [<ffffffff8113d007>] SyS_rmdir+0x11/0x13
 [<ffffffff81528a09>] tracesys_phase2+0xd4/0xd9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to