On Wednesday, November 05, 2014 03:42:38 PM David Howells wrote:
> Use the copy-up security hooks previously provided to allow an LSM to adjust
> the security on a newly created copy and to filter the xattrs copied to
> that file copy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowe...@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
>  fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index ea10a8719107..53a357d0a214 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ int ovl_copy_xattr(struct dentry *old, struct dentry
> *new) error = size;
>                       goto out_free_value;
>               }
> +             error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(old, new,
> +                                                  name, value, &size);

So the LSM must modify the xattr in place?  I suppose that since the @value is 
allocated to the max size it shouldn't be a problem.  Just checking ...

> +             if (error < 0)
> +                     goto out_free_value;
> +             if (error == 1) {
> +                     error = 0;
> +                     continue; /* Discard */
> +             }
>               error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
>               if (error)
>                       goto out_free_value;

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to