Hi!
> > And there I was thinking "bandwidth reclamation" was
> > for optimizing bandwidth usage, not pessimizing it! :)
>
> USB bandwidth, other busses don't matter...
>
> But seriously, what should be the correct heuristic for that? Decreasing the
> reclamation duration leads to problems with some devices (as a posting
> recently showed...). No reclamation provides miserable USB bandwidth and
> depth first sequence has no fair scheduling.
What impact has depth-first on usb bandwidth?
With FSBR I get 700KB/sec with usb-to-usb.
With depth-first but no FSBR I get 300..400KB/sec with usb-to-usb
networking. Does it have something to do with frames starting in the
middle of usb frame?
Pavel
--
I'm [EMAIL PROTECTED] "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care."
Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
