> > > To follow up myself, should not defer_bh use irqsave spinlocks?
> >
> > I can't see why, considering it's already called in_irq() ... unless
> > you're using some host controller driver that's not in the standard
> > kernel, and calls completions in a softirq/tasklet/bh/... ?
>
> Are you sure interrupts run with further interrupts disabled? I do not
> think so.
I see what you're saying ... it's a question of which interrupts!
Interrupts using different IRQs won't be disabled. Yep, that's
deserving of a patchlet.
- Dave
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
