> From: "Nemosoft Unv." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 03:18:35 +0100
> Hmm, okay, I lied a bit. The bug was actually introduced in 2.4.10 (Linus > tree). The bug was discussed on linusb-usb-devel on 27/09. > > However, the bug report sent to me on RedHat's 2.4.9-7 is exactly the same > bug (Killing interrupt handler, stacktrace ends in process_urb). > It may be Red Hat has included some 'innocent' parts from 2.4.10 into their > 2.4.9 kernel, since they didn't want 2.4.10 itself. Yes, I think this is how it sneaked in. > > - list_del (p); > + p_tmp = p; > p = p->next; > + list_del (p_tmp); > delete_desc (s, desc); An update for this is out, it's at ftp.redhat.com /pub/redhat/linux/updates/7.2/en/os/kernel-2.4.9-13.i386.rpm > Pete: can I assume this will be investigated and fixed (since you have a > @redhat.com address). I tried to enter it on bugzilla, but after I entered > all information it start to bug me about an E-mail address and password, > which I don't have (I really wished it asked that *before* I started....) The bugzilla would the best way. Someone already filed this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55640 The registration is a necessary evil that prevents spiders from trashing the Bugzilla (of course, you can write a malicious script in 5 minutes, this is against Google mostly). Thanks for the patch. -- Pete _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
