On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 11:52:09AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > I still don't see a real benefit in this mechanism, but if it's > going to be done, then these were the two places to add > it in the "hcd.c" file.
Just think, no more fun discussions with Oliver about the urb lifecycle, multiple processors, and novice device driver authors :) > Errm -- why not just do urb = usb_get_urb ()? There's > no need to rename the parameter. > > Just increment the counter as part of linking it onto the > device's urb list. No failure test is even needed, and all > the existing cleanup paths will handle decrementing that > counter appropriately. That'll be a much smaller/cleaner > patch ... :) Good point. I changed this to be much less intrusive in the patch I just sent off. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
