On Friday 08 February 2002 14:55, Georg Acher wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:38:35PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Which UHCI driver are you using? > > > > > > I assume usb-uhci since that's what RH 7.2 uses? > > > > Yes - usb-uhci. > > There were a few bugs in URB queuing in usb-uhci, I fixed them AFAIK at > about >2.4.10. > And, yes - OHCI is much smarter in transferring data. Queuing URBs is > really a pain for UHCI...
I was having problems with missing data when on an out pipe under heavy traffic situations with Redhat 7.1 and kernel 2.4.5. This was fixed when I upgraded to 2.4.17. I assume that your fix around 2.4.10 fixed this. My problem on the in pipe, which is probably the same as Chris's, was not fixed by upgrading to 2.4.17. I am not queueing urbs on the read pipe though. How would you recommend writing a ethernet usb driver where we have to deal with heavy traffic. Should I really be using multiple read URBs (we don't under Windows and Mac)? I agree with Chris that from the driver perspective things should work the same way whether UHCI (either driver) or OHCI is being used. David _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
