On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:

| On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Georg Acher wrote:
|
| > On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 05:33:13PM -0600, Matthew Fredrickson wrote:
| >
| > > More data: IIRC, on the vanilla uhci.c driver, ISOC sucks.  Sucks really
| > > badly.  Kind of funny though, 'cause I was helping somebody with writing a
| > > driver for something that used BULK transfers, and the usb-uhci driver
| > > kept on Oops!'ing his system (dereferencing a NULL pointer in the host
| > > controller code) whenever he tried to initiate his transfer.  Switching to
| >
| > Were there bug reports for this? Does it still happen?
| >
| > > the uhci.c driver corrected this.  Go Figure.  So both drivers are
| > > good/bad at different things, though the usb-uhci driver seems to
| > > perform/behave better for most cases I've seen.
| >
| > Just as a side note: We use ISO streaming for our DABUSB-device, which needs
| > about 384KB/s. It works reliably for _months_, but only with Intel chipsets.
| > VIA chipsets produce errors (corrupted packets) every few hours.
| >
|
| Oh, this could be the problems that I've seen.  I've only had access to
| VIA based UHCI controllers.  Maybe I'll see if I can go hunt up some other
| UHCI controllers and see what happens...

The only places that I have ever seen UHCI controllers are from
VIA (standalone or integrated chipsets) or Intel chipsets.

Did you mean that you'll try a system with an Intel chipset?
The other option is to find one of manh OHCI controllers available.

-- 
~Randy


_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to