On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Roman Weissgaerber wrote:
>>- I'd suggested that the bandwidth would stay scheduled until >> after an interrupt transfer completed, there was no transfer >> queued. >> >If I understand you right here, I think you lose the offset (or phase) >information >of the interrupt schedule of the endpoint. >E.g. if we send single shot interrupt URBs every 10ms to a 255ms >endpoint. Then I >think the transfer should take place every 255 ms. >With your model there would be a transfer every 10ms. If the driver asks for 10ms polling (even though the ep says it expects 255ms), should the HCD really second-guess the driver...? -- Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------------------------------- 186,282 miles per second: It isn't just a good idea, it's the law! _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
