> In general, I'd think we would be better off minimizing per-request
> memory allocations.  We can't avoid them with TDs.  Roman has
> advocated preallocation of config/altsetting data (QH/ED data),
> and I agree that's desirable.  We can also get rid of them in the
> case of per-URB data.  In the 2.5 series that'd be my preference
> for a "real fix" (along with related HCD updates to promote more
> uniform behavior).

Can we in this way totally avoid allocating memory in the HCDs ?

        Regards
                Oliver

_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to