On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:21:54PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > I don't know if you have to implement it to find out. How about a rough > design?
Will do. > > What do you mean, "real virtual driver filesystem"? > > Something people will accept. /proc has been abused too much for this > kind of thing and people bitch about usbdevfs. We snuck it in under > people's noses. driverfs is probably what you are looking for. There's some good documentation written on how to use it, and what it is for around somewhere. > > Isoc isn't handled today by usbfs :) > > Of course it is. There's a complete URB interface which supports all 4 > transfer types. Look for USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB. Oh, didn't realize that, sorry. Does anyone use it today? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
