On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 02:10:50PM -0700, Christopher Hoover wrote:
> # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
> # Project Name: greg k-h's linux 2.5 USB kernel tree
> # This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
> # This patch includes the following deltas:
> #                ChangeSet    1.611   -> 1.612  
> #     drivers/media/video/videodev.c  1.7     -> 1.8    
> #
> # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
> # --------------------------------------------
> # 02/06/11    [EMAIL PROTECTED]       1.612
> # videodev_proc_destory is needed when built-in to kernel too
> # --------------------------------------------
> #
> diff -Nru a/drivers/media/video/videodev.c b/drivers/media/video/videodev.c
> --- a/drivers/media/video/videodev.c  Tue Jun 11 14:10:50 2002
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/videodev.c  Tue Jun 11 14:10:50 2002
> @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@
>       video_dev_proc_entry->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef MODULE
>  #if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) && defined(CONFIG_VIDEO_PROC_FS)
>  static void videodev_proc_destroy(void)
>  {
> @@ -298,7 +297,6 @@
>       if (video_proc_entry != NULL)
>               remove_proc_entry("video", &proc_root);
>  }
> -#endif
>  #endif
>  
>  static void videodev_proc_create_dev (struct video_device *vfd, char *name)

I just hit this myself trying to test the se401 driver.  I think this
isn't quite right.  The MODULE tests should go, but the PROC_FS &&
VIDEO_PROC_FS tests should be moved up to catch videodev_proc_create().

-- 
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

_______________________________________________________________

Multimillion Dollar Computer Inventory
Live Webcast Auctions Thru Aug. 2002 - http://www.cowanalexander.com/calendar



_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to