On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:35:37PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > > I compiled 2.5.25 yesterday, > and found the organisation of the USB host files difficult to fathom. > > (1) As far as I could make out, one _had_ to choose uhci-hcd > if one one simply ran "make xconfig" and wanted UHCI. > If this is the intention, why leave the other uhci*.c files there? > If they don't work, they shouldn't be there. > If they do work, they should be offered as options.
I sent a patch to Linus yesterday to remove the other .c files that are no longer able to be selected. > (2) The name "uhci-hcd" struck me as odd. > Surely "usb" should figure in it, if people (in particular, me) are not to get >confused? It matches the other USB HCD (host controller driver) drivers names (ehci-hcd, ohci-hcd). > (3) I found the documentation on this subject, in uhci.txt, > less than lucid. That file was last updated in 1999, it's a bit old :) > I'm a bit grumpy, as the kernel didn't actually work on my Sony C1VFK -- > or at least it only works one time in three. > The other two times it bombs out with "hda: error: DMA in progress". > (I realise this has nothing to do with USB.) Sorry for your ide problems. See lkml for some patches that might be able to help you out. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
