> From: Petko Manolov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 21:51:39 -0700 (PDT)
> Do you by any chance know the vendor and device id of that Melco device?
The patch was attached to the bug report. This part was sane:
@@ -72,11 +72,15 @@
/* Define these values to match your device */
#define VENDOR_ID_REALTEK 0x0bda
+#define VENDOR_ID_MELCO 0x411
+
#define PRODUCT_ID_RTL8150 0x8150
+#define PRODUCT_ID_LUAKTX 0x12
/* table of devices that work with this driver */
static struct usb_device_id rtl8150_table [] = {
{ USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ID_REALTEK, PRODUCT_ID_RTL8150) },
+ { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ID_MELCO, PRODUCT_ID_LUAKTX) },
{ }
};
This got me thinking:
@@ -671,8 +675,11 @@
err("usb_set_configuration() failed");
return NULL;
}
- if ((udev->descriptor.idVendor != VENDOR_ID_REALTEK) ||
- (udev->descriptor.idProduct != PRODUCT_ID_RTL8150)) {
+ if ((udev->descriptor.idVendor == VENDOR_ID_REALTEK) ||
+ (udev->descriptor.idProduct == PRODUCT_ID_RTL8150) ||
+ ((udev->descriptor.idVendor == VENDOR_ID_MELCO) &&
+ (udev->descriptor.idProduct == PRODUCT_ID_LUAKTX))) {
+ } else {
err("Not the one we are interested about");
return NULL;
}
I think you better drop this if statement altogether.
-- Pete
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
