Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 22. Juli 2002 20:51 schrieb David Brownell: > >>Greg KH wrote: >> >>>On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 10:16:48PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: >>> >>>>>Does anyone/anything use this file? The driverfs changes kind of >>>>>make this file redundant. Does anyone really want it back? >>>> >>>>So what else can go into driverfs ? >>> >>I'd rather know what _should_ go into it ... :) > > > What can should, as we all love generic functionality, don't we?
I mean rather that there's a cost to everything, and the fact that we "can" do something (compute the relevant digits of PI?) doesn't mean we "should". > [..] > >>I suspect that device and config descriptors shouldn't appear, >>although there might be an argument for them (useful, and we >>already have a text format). > > > Why not? It's my understanding that "driverfs" isn't supposed to replace "usbfs". - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
