On Sat, Oct 12, 2002, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 04:14:38PM -0400, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > > Ok, I'm breaking up the big patch into smaller ones, at least for the > > simple(r) stuff. > > I'll wait for Johannes to ack any of these before applying them. > > > This one fixes a bug where different names were being used for creation > > and removal of the /proc/ entry. > > Any reason to not finally move these files over to driverfs, where they > now belong? I remember trying to do this a while ago, but the driverfs > infrastructure wasn't there, but it looks like the API is now present > (DRIVER_ATTR() should do what you need, or DEVICE_ATTR() if you want to > go off of every uhci pci device, I don't remember what these proc files > did.)
Depends. Those proc entries are merely for debugging. It's the wrong thing to be used for and I'm not sure it should be in driverfs either. It has been discussed a while ago to convert all of that into a debugging module that can be loaded if the user needs/wants it. JE ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
