>>>>When that second driver submits its urb, assuming that needs
>>>>to reserve some bandwidth, the "is it available" logic will be
>>>>accounting for the first endpoint's bandwidth consumption.
>>>>Because it would never have been released.
>>>
>>>Yes it will be released. There are no URB's outstanding for that
>>>endpoint.
>>
>>But the endpoint was still busy, so bandwidth wasn't released.
>>Go back and reread what I wrote.
>>
>>Soon I'll get _really_ tired of repeating that part of what
>>I've been saying all along. When that happens, you can just
>>assume it still stays true.
>
>
> Same here.
>
> Same shit as the reference counting thread. You have some screwed up way
> of doing something in your head and you're too stubborn to realize it's
> dumb.
Meanwhile, you descend to verbal abuse ("shit", "screwed up", dumb")
if I don't let you twist _my own words_ until they contradict themselves,
letting you can claim you've proven something.
Anyone has a right to object to that kind of treatment.
If not an actual responsibility.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
