On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 04:08:41PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > >On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > >> > >> This patch sets up the URB interval correctly when using interrupts via > >> usbfs. This is finally possible since the automagic resubmission is gone. > > > >Hm, I don't understand, what does this patch do that couldn't be done > >before? Oh, we were forced to do "one shot" interrupt urbs before, > >right? How does this patch change the way userspace programs that > >were used to the old way work? > > There is no change to userspace programs. Before the interval was set to > 0 (one-shot), this changes usbfs to use the endpoint's requested interval > (bInterval).
But wouldn't any program that expected a one shot interrupt, be supprised with this change? Or am I just missing something really basic here? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
