On Thu, Dec 05, 2002, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 05:25:01PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > Any particular reason for this? > > My previous LSM example module patch added EXPORT_SYMBOL() for these > lists. As these symbols previously were only accessable from within the > kernel, I realized that I should probably mark them _GPL() to keep the > same "kind" of access. But I realized this after I sent the original > patch to Linus. > > This patch fixes that. > > Are there any objections to useing _GPL() for these symbols?
If that's the case, no. I was worried that we had exported it for a while and then it was changed just now. If we never exported it before just recently, then I don't see the harm :) JE ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
