Matthew Dharm wrote:
Does this work (without the patch) with 2.5.x?  It should, since the latest
2.5.x doesn't keep any data about a device once it's removed.

I didn't try with 2.5 as I currently can't switch to 2.5 for some reasons. Nevertheless I don't believe it will work wit 2.5 as

1. the device reports a data length of 0 for maximum LUN inquiry
  so usb storage can only assume a single LUN

2. the device seems to return only weird stuff for LUN1 if LUN1
  is not attached that effectively prevents mass storage initialization
  to complete in 2.4.20 (one must manually set up sense data as
  the device either doesn't return anything or rubbish)

[snip]



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial.
www.slickedit.com/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to