On Tue, Feb 25, 2003, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > The question should be, what a reference may be used for after
> > > disconnect(). To determine requirements we must look at the worst case.
> > > In this case this is reassignment of the interface right after
> > > disconnect().
> > > The interface belongs to another driver now. The old driver must not
> > > do any IO to the device.
> > >
> > > So it seems to me that the only thing you may do with a reference
> > > is not waiting for the completion handlers to run after you know that
> > > an asynchronous unlink was successful.
> > > On the other hand for 2.4 you need the waiting logic in the __exit
> > > path anyway.
> > >
> > > So in practice disconnect() means a cold, hard stop using that device.
> >
> > Is that really to be expected?
> >
> > How often do admins change device drivers? In 99% of the cases, there's
> > only one device driver.
> 
> The same is true for configuration changes. Anyway the point is moot.
> It's a legal operation. Therefore it has to work.

You mean changing the configuration on a device?

Right now there is no policy whatsoever about how that is supposed to
work safely.

As a result, I think it's premature to say that it's moot and has to
work. That may be true in the end, but I think we need to figure out all
of the rest of the issues before we set anything in stone.

Did you have a proposal for a contract about changing configurations?

> > However, in the cases that I can see using a reference past
> > disconnect(), an application still has a device open. In that case, the
> > module usage count is already > 0, preventing module unloading.
> 
> Entirely possible. But not guaranteed.

I don't quite understand your comment,

JE



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to