On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:38:41PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg & David: > > You wouldn't expect that an innocent two-line patch would practically > destroy the entire functionality of the USB subsystem. But that's what my > last patch did. I didn't realize until I saw it in Greg's list of patches > forwarded to Linus; that patch includes a mistakenly unreverted prior > change. This explains the problems I was having yesterday, and probably > also the problems a great many people are having today.
Oops, this is really my fault, as I edited your patch to look like what was applied. I didn't think it would matter, and foolishly, I didn't test it (I thought I had, but hadn't reloaded the usbcore module.) Anyway, I've sent it on to Linus, as he also reported the problem. Again, very sorry about this, and thank you for the quick response, I always like getting patches for problems before I realize they are problems :) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
