On Tue 10 June 2003 23:12, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > Hi Daniele, Hi Randy, nice to see you (even if nice to hear you would be more appropriate ;) )
> Were you able to test this new code path? If so, how? Well, that's a good question ... because i don't know if there is any distro program that play with LP_ABORTOPEN i've just tried with a simple user code that set/clear LP_ABORTOPEN through a ioctl syscall. Apparently it works fine. Because you are at it i wish to say that, in my opinion, adding an entry to sysctl tables would be more appropriate than playing with ioctl. For example, a user/sysadm could set automaticaly LP_ABORTOPEN in any init script to avoid to code a program that just set/clear it. Be aware that this will break compatibility with parallel printer device drivers where such sysctl entry doesn't exist. > More comments after I try to test it... You're welcome. Daniele. PGP PKEY http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&op=index ICQ# 104896040 Netphone/Fax 178.605.7063 Homepage http://web.tiscali.it/bellucda ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
