On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> This is actually the second complaint I've gotten along these lines... in
> the other case, it appeared that the MODE_SENSE/MODE_SENSE_10 logic had
> gotten screwed up.
>
> I think it might actually be a merging problem somewhere along the line,
> because my tree (which is based off of the USB tree) works just fine.
Are you sure that your devices don't just handle READ_6 and SENSE_6 ok?
Because there is no merge error that I can see: the patch you sent is
still there in the same form, and the "use_10_for_XX" values are just
_wrong_ (both zero, should be both one). I made it work by just forcing
them to 1 at the places they were tested.
I'll add a few more printk's to see what gets set and what gets cleared.
Linus
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission!
INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
