On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 12. August 2003 17:57 schrieb Alan Stern: > > > > Maybe it's an attempt to protect against the "device-morphed" possibility. > > I'm planning a re-write of that whole area. For now, it would probably be > > okay to remove the down_read() and up_read() in usb_reset_device(). > > No, it is a guard against probe() which is bound to fail during a reset.
But Andries's problem is that now reset is bound to fail during probe(). What probe() does it protect against? Are you concerned that a driver bound to one interface might reset the device while another interface is being probed? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
