On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 08:51:05AM +0100, Julian Back wrote: > David Brownell wrote: > >Julian Back wrote: > > > >> > >>My mass storage driver is intended as a demonstration so I was > >>planning to implement it as a user application using the GadgetFS, is > >>there any reason (other than performance) why I shouldn't do that? > > > > > >Another demonstration would of course be run NFS in the > >device, accessing the files from some Linux host. > > > >On the other hand, I'm looking forward to seeing Alan's code. > >It should be a bit more usable "out of the box" for talking > >to MSFT hosts. > > That's the reason I have chosen to implement mass storage - I need to be > able to demonstrate the device with a Windows host and mass storage is the > only useful gadget that won't require a custom Windows driver.
There used to be a "generic" usb-serial driver that came included with all Windows systems (back around Win2k time). All that you had to do was modify a .inf file to add some product and vendor ids to it in order to have a working device. Don't know if that's still there, but I guess we should write a gadget usb-serial driver too... thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best hiring companies. http://www.dice.com/index.epl?rel_code=104 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
