Randy.Dunlap wrote:

David, changes to gadget API OK?

I had some most of them along with some unrelated changes; I'll send them in a separate patch to Greg.

But I've got a couple questions about this one, maybe you know the
answers to them:

-       unsigned                no_interrupt : 1,
-                               zero : 1,
-                               short_not_ok : 1;
+       unsigned                no_interrupt:1,
+                               zero:1,
+                               short_not_ok:1;

I tried this and it made "no_interrupt" appear in the kerneldoc. But NOT the other two bits. Is someone fixing kerneldoc bugs, so that issue can have some useful resolution?

Related question, I'm guessing that having each one on a line
by itself would make kerneldoc happy.  But as I recall, that'd
be at the cost of making the bits live in separate words, which
is waste I'd rather avoid ... know if that's true?

- Dave




------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to