> It should handle that okay (provided you retain a reference to the
> usb_device so that it doesn't get deallocated). Although it wouldn't hurt
> to change one of the tests from
>
> if (dev->state != USB_STATE_ADDRESS)
>
> to
>
> if (dev->state > USB_STATE_ADDRESS)
By the way, my patch tests for disconnect in usbfs by doing:
if (dev->state == USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED)
run_away();
Is this right?
Thanks,
Duncan.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin.
Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
