On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:04:56PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106727220028358&w=2 > > as121 changed config.c to accept devices that number their > > interfaces starting at 1 rather than 0 > > Hm, I took your "as122" patch, which was a portion of this patch split > up, right?
Yes, you did accept as122. But it was a completely different patch from this one. It provided for devices that mistakenly _do_ have a _configuration_ #0. This patch, as121, is for devices that _don't_ have _interface_ #0 :-) > I took that, and from the archive, I didn't like the whole > "as121" patch as it was, and asked for it to be broken up into pieces. > I thought you did that, but I guess I might have gotten it wrong. I never broke it up, no. As I recall, you mentioned that sorting the descriptors might not be necessary. I pointed out that the sort only took about 3 lines of code (and David Brownell mentioned that he knew of at least one device that does list its descriptors in non-numerical order). After that nothing happened. If at this point you still would like the patch to be changed, just let me know. Keeping the patch very short presumably isn't as much of an issue now that it clearly won't go in before 2.6.1? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
