On Friday 19 December 2003 18:35, you wrote: > Matt Dharm uses 240. Max, please try 240 first, it's consistent > with the 2.6. Let us know the result. > > -- Pete
Thanks for your replies. I am confused.- 240? What do you mean? The patch I got was against 2.4.23, which is the kernel version I use. I have a suspicion that this problem may somehow be related to funny hardware. I could not reproduce the problem on another system running the same kernel version. However that system has USB 2.0 and this a different UHC... Anyway, the kernel should not Oops, even with shoddy hardware, or am I mistaken here? Can somebody please explain what was going on when this crash happened? Somehow you must have a suspicion. Unfortunately I will be pretty much offline over christmas/newyears, but I will look into this and try the patch as soon as I can. Have a nice christmas everybody. Cheers, Max ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
