> So everybody who does not want to know how integers are represented
> on the current architecture writes
> start = p[0] + (p[1] << 8) + (p[2] << 16) + (p[3] << 24);
> And it just works.
Really, do you think your statement is better, clearer, or less
error-prone than this:
start = get_be32(p);
?
I have been arguing that casts are bad. If get_le32(p) does not
involve a cast but is just an abbreviation of what I wrote above,
then of course I do not object.
Andries
[did you write be32 by mistake?]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
