On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 16:27, Mike Anderson wrote: > This matches what I thought should be added to sd, but I did not hear an > answer from James / others if this is the way we should handle it.
Actually, perhaps we should treat it *exactly* the same as RECOVERED_ERROR (i.e. do the print_sense) so that if something goes wrong with ignoring NO_SENSE returns, we have a trace that it happened. otherwise I'm fine with this. James ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
