On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:

> On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
> 
> > The patch below is nearly the same as the last one, and you should test it
> > in the same way.  What's new about it is that it prints out the values
> > stored in the "terminating TD".  That's the Transaction Descriptor at the
> > end of the USB schedule, and it's the one that set_next_interrupt relies
> > on to actually cause an interrupt request.
> 
> Ok, you asked for it - it is below. But I guess, it is going to disappoint
> you - those TDs are exactly the same before and after the error. If I read
> it right.

It's not a disappointment -- it indicates that the TD isn't getting messed 
up, so the problem must lie in the controller itself.  In other words, the 
hardware seems to be misbehaving.  I say "seems to be" because I'm still 
not entirely certain that it isn't an error in the driver causing this, 
but it's pretty hard to see how it could be.

I'll probably have to get some advice on how to attack this.  More 
later...

Alan Stern




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to