On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 02:09, David Brownell wrote: > Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, David Monniaux wrote: > > > >>It seems to be that there's something severely broken in 2.4.x and 2.6.y > >>kernels when dealing with the results of a reset, when the enumeration > >>associated with the device changes a lot. > > Yeah, I don't think the reset code has ever worked well. > Except maybe in some rather constrained paths, and you > don't seem to have been on one of those. > > The at76c503a also has some DFU code, which seemed to work > for me on 2.6 when I grabbed a snapshot. Maybe between > your two efforts, a reusable DFU module can happen? :)
That code for at76c503a.berlios.de should already be reusable, it is a separate module. But it has never been tested for other hardware than Atmel - so far I did not know that other hardware even exists. It was already merged into an -ac patch for 2.4, I do not know if it's still there. Greetings, Oliver
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
