Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, David Brownell wrote:


Alan Stern wrote:

Perhaps even worse, if there are interfaces claimed by usbfs then calling usb_set_configuration() will result in deadlock.

This makes me think that if _any_ interfaces are claimed, then this call should be rejected.


That might be a good idea. I wonder how gphoto2 would react, though?

Not to mention that the test is prone to races.

Only because usb_set_configuration() grabs dev->serialize internally, unlike usb_reset_configuration() ... I'll have to dig out my path resolving that issue.

- Dvae





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to