Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, in digging further, I say apply Alan's patch, as it is correct for > now. It's not the cleanest thing right now, but I'll be working on > fixing up this stuff for good this week, as it seems there is a lot of > confusion about USB interfaces and devices and the driver model still.
I don't see what's "unclean" about it actually. The kernel shouldn't hang around waiting for objects to hit a zero refcount - especially userspace-accessible objects. But then, I don't have a clue what we're synchronising against there ;) > Andrew, do you want me to send the patch to Linus, or will you? Send it yourself, please. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
