Am Freitag, 30. April 2004 21:19 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Not at all. The core already contains the necessary locking, and I
> mentioned in passing that the check has to be done at the right place.
> This simple patch will do the job:
Doh. OK, right you are :-)
It seems to me that the approach satisfying all requirements would be
a combined approach using a reject flag and a waitqueue.
It just occured to me that the reject flag is essentially what we need
to eventually solve the soft disconnect problem :-)
If you don't mind I'll make a patch tomorrow, as it is past midnight
here.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
