On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Rogério Brito wrote: > Now, I compiled the kernel with the array of size 8 instead of 64 and > everything seems to be working fine. Thanks. Does this mean that this newer > version (or something inspired in it) may be included in newer kernels? > It is nice to save a few bytes also. :-)
I'll submit the 8-byte patch soon. > Ok, thanks for seeing the logs and telling me the workaround. I'm looking > forward for the 2.6.8 kernel, then. Talking about newer releases, would it > be possible to have the patch with the larger array in time for 2.6.8? Can't tell. There's the question of how long it will take for the patch to be accepted, and there's the question of how soon before 2.6.8 appears. I don't know the answer to either one. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
