On Wednesday 11 August 2004 6:48 am, Alan Stern wrote: > I'd be surprised if usb_kill_urb() turns out to be the problem. (Of > course, as it's author I would say that!) After all, the "control timeout > on ep0out" message comes from a handler that gets invoked only for URBs > submitted using usb_start_wait_urb(), which always uses asynchronous > unlinking. And even if it didn't, the unlinking part of the pathway has > hardly changed.
The last version I looked at was using using usb_kill_urb() there, it'd stopped using async unlink. And a few folk reported "-ENOENT" status too -- hence my desire to rule kill_urb() problems out (or in) in at least this case. Though come to think of it, that was in some version of Greg's tree not an rc3 tree, and it looks to not be there right now ... oh well, ignore that suggestion then! > A more likely possibility is that for some unknown reason the ohci_hcd > driver isn't receiving the interrupts needed to retire the unlinked URB. We've certainly seen that one too ... but usually because the ACPI IRQ mapping changed. Not a factor on hardware with an SA-1100. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
