On Fri, Sep 03, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 03 September 2004 5:00 am, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 02, David Brownell wrote: > > > > Can you try this patch? Ideally the entire first scan > > > would be aborted and the second scan started. > > > But it's a lot simpler to just not start the second one, > > > and trust the I/O watchdog to catch any lost IRQ. > > > > Yes, that patch works with Linus current and also with our 2.6.6 based > > kernel. Thanks! > > Great to know! But I don't think that'll explain Richard's > problem, unless his new arch was SMP or his early port > work didn't quite handle the IRQ/timer interaction right.
It can probably not happen on UP, maybe with CONFIG_PREEMPT -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÃRNBERG ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idP47&alloc_id808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
