Am Dienstag, 21. September 2004 22:44 schrieb Kyle Harris:
> > I don't think memory usage patterns in the USB subsystem have changed
> > significantly since 2.6.0. �The new HCD is definitely the most likely
> > suspect. �But not being familiar with either the old or the new one, I
> > can't offer any suggestions about what might have changed.
>
> I agree. But this is what makes no sense. I can loop writing a 1 M file to
> the usbdrive. The system will run out of memory after 6-7 loops. But if I
> umount the usbdrive between each write the system works fine. I don't see how
> performing an umount would have any affect memory management within the HCD.
> Any ideas?
Does it work if you replace the umount with a delay of equal
duration? Will sync have the same effect has umount?
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
