On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 01:08:31PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote: > This is patch as384. It reverts some of our sanity checks on the GetMaxLUN > part of the Bulk-only protocol. Apparently, this is one area where vendors > can't even get close to correct. So, in the face of any sort of error, we > assume a single LUN. > > We also include some comments so we don't make this mistake again. > > Greg, please apply.
Applied, thanks. greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
