On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 05:12:25PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > Greg: > > > > This patch fixes two small problems in the port suspend/resume handling > > for the UHCI driver. There were a couple of spots where I neglected to > > store I/O addresses in unsigned _long_ variables (required for 64-bit > > architectures). And it turns out the host controller will continue to > > indicate a resume is in progress for a few microseconds after it has been > > turned off, so an extra delay is needed. > > > > Please apply. > > Should this be applied for 2.6.10? Or can it wait? Any bugreports > because of this?
It won't hurt anything to put this in 2.6.10; the change is very innocuous. There was a report some time back (I don't recall if it actually mentioned the driver failing or if it was just a correction) from someone with a 64-bit system, pointing out that in other places the I/O address needed to be unsigned long. The same correction clearly needs to be made here. If you're going to send out one final batch of patches for 2.6.10, then this should be included. If not, it will be okay to let it wait until later. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
