On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 23:17:22 +0200 (EET), Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This sounds like a poor example to me. If an application wants to > > test existing capabilities, it can do that before forking. We don't have > > to accommodate this sort of behaviour, so Sergey's patch looks good enough. > > Meelis, does it solve your modem_run problem? Yes or no? > > Kaupo Arulo is actually the one who found the problem and wrote a patch > that cured it for him. I don't like his patch, although it does the same thing. Sergey did it cleaner with partitioning of usbdev_ioctl() into locked and unlocked. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
