On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 14:07 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > I have been running with just the code portion of this patch for a while > now, with good results (no Kconfig changes.) > > Pete and Matt, do you mind me applying the following portion of the > patch to the kernel tree? > > > -#if !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB) && !defined(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB_MODULE) > > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0781, 0x0002, 0x0009, 0x0009, > > "Sandisk", > > "ImageMate SDDR-31", > > US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, > > US_FL_IGNORE_SER ), > > -#endif
Urgh. Please do. Code which may compile differently in the kernel image according to which _modules_ are configured at the time is horrid, and should be avoided. -- dwmw2 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
