> The other path introduced by my patch where IRQ_NONE can be returned > gets used only at times when the controller is not running > and hence is > incapable of generating interrupts. So it shouldn't be a problem. > > Would this be satisfactory? Or do you prefer to change the > core interrupt > routines?
The patch looks OK to me. -ch ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
