The Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:35:31 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Samuel Colin wrote: > > > > This looks like another device problem (not a SCSI problem). > > > > > Do you mean it's the usb routines of the kernel which seem not to be > > well supported by the via usb2 chipset ? > > I mean the disk or its USB interface is misbehaving, even though the > kernel and drivers all seem to be acting correctly. > Maybe a fuzzy point in the USB2 or scsi specifications everyone interpreted differently. > Maybe it's some very sensitive timing issue that's highly > hardware-dependent. > BTW, the disk is this one : http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10399 > I wonder if increasing it more, say to 200, would have an effect? > Perhaps I'm fixated on that delay, but it's the only factor I've ever seen > that was related to the kind of problem you have. > No, I just tried (removed the experimental patch and increased to 200), the fsck on the disk hung again. The Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:08:55 -0800 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I patched, I compiled, I installed, it worked. > > That makes more for another config that won't work without that patch ... > :) > It *almost* worked without the patch. It's just the fsck that showed the problems. Though, knowing how crucial fsck is... :-P Regards, Samuel Colin ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
