On Thursday 31 March 2005 00:27, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 13:48 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > -#define DRIVER_VERSION "USBLCD Driver Version 1.04" > > +#define DRIVER_VERSION "USBLCD Driver Version 1.05" > > If it is a complete rewrite, wouldn't a new version number be > appropriate? I don't know if this ever makes it to userspace (didn't > check the code) but...
I removed all the copyright lines from the original author, because it's a complete new driver. I kept the version numbering though, because although it's a complete new one, it replaces an already existing one. So, I would keep the old copyright out, anyway. But you're right about the version number. Maybe 1.0 would be better (1.0, because the driver is ready for production, and no beta-ware) What do you think ? -- Kind regards, Georges Toth ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
