On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:20:02PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 04 April 2005 9:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Why can't we make this module as module and it should be like acm module > > loaded as soon as device communication device connected to the system. > > A module already _is_ a module ... I for one don't understand this > question. > > That said, it'd also be interesting to just have the cdc-acm code > reuse the same generic serial infrastructure as the other serial > drivers. They're not quite the same, so my naturally suspicious > mind accordingly suspects that one or the other of them may well > be hiding bugs. (If not both. And yes, that's in addition to > the ones in the tty/serial subsystem, slowly getting fixed.)
And the usb-serial drivers should use the generic serial interface. It's been on my todo list for forever, but maybe one day... thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
